Freedom Folks

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Mexico Opposes Border Wall

Filed under "And who's suprised exactly?" (read story here)

"We will use all means necessary, and I am referring to things like international tribunals (and other) international action, to make it clear that this is not an act that would resolve the migration issue," Derbez said.

I only hope Mexico suing us in an international tribunal would get some Americans pissed off at long last.

Opponents say a fence would not be 100 percent effective.
I guess birth control is out, not a 100% effective don'tcha know.

"I guarantee the U.S. government that (a wall) will not stop migrants. What will happen is they will climb over it or burrow underneath," Derbez said. "The solution is an agreement to permit legal migration, secure and ordered."
So long as Mexico aids and abets to it's utmost, your absolutely correct sir.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said a wall running the length of the border would cost too much and did not make sense for desert areas.

Uh-huh, thanks Mike, you talk a good sandwich on occasion, but, your real feelings peek out now and again. A wall has the absolute virtue of being a concrete step we can take to, at the very least, limit illegal immigration and the possibility of terrorists slipping over our southern border.

Just as an FYI, Mike also signed off on a pact to merge security with Canada, Mexico and the US. One big shared border, so he may have a dog in this fight. if you don't know about this click on the link and feast your eyes. If this doesn't chill your blood, well, we probably don't have anything else to chat about here.

One year's worth of pork would more than adequately pay for a wall, and it would be money better spent than another concrete eyesore with Bob Byrd's name emblazoned on it.
h/t Minuteman National Blog

As viewed at:
Don Surber (the great and mighty, well, he doesn't stink)
bRight & Early (uh-huh, sleepin' in again huh?)
basil's blog
Diane's stuff
NIF
Rempelia Prime
-----